Meet MarketerHire's newest SEO + AEO product

One80 Intermediaries isn't optimized for AI search yet.

We audited your search visibility across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. One80 Intermediaries was cited in 1 of 5 answers. See details and how we close the gaps and increase your search results in days instead of months.

Immediate in-depth auditvs. 8 months at agencies

One80 Intermediaries is cited in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "wholesale insurance brokerage." Competitors are winning the unbranded category answers.

Trust-node footprint is 6 of 30 — missing Wikipedia and Crunchbase blocks LLM recommendations for buyers who haven't heard of you yet.

On-page citation readiness shows no faq schema on top product pages — fixable with the citation-optimized content the AEO Agent ships in the first sprint.

AI-Forward Companies Trust MarketerHire

Plaid Plaid
MasterClass MasterClass
Constant Contact Constant Contact
Netflix Netflix
Noom Noom
Tinuiti Tinuiti
30,000+
Matches Made
6,000+
Customers
Since 2019
Track Record

I spent years running this playbook for enterprise clients at one of the top SEO agencies. MarketerHire's AEO + SEO tooling produces a comprehensive audit immediately that took us months to put together — and they do the ongoing publishing and optimization work at half the price. If I were buying this today, I'd buy it here.

— Marketing leader, formerly at a top SEO growth agency

AI Search Audit

Here's Where You Stand in AI Search

A real audit. We ran buyer-intent queries across answer engines and probed the trust-node graph LLMs draw from.

Sample mini-audit only. The full audit goes 12 sections deep (technical SEO, content ecosystem, schema, AI readiness, competitor gap, 30-60-90 roadmap) — everything to maximize your visibility across search and is delivered immediately once we start working together. See a sample full audit →

20
out of 100
Major gap, real upside

Your buyers are asking AI assistants for wholesale insurance brokerage and One80 Intermediaries isn't being recommended. Closing this gap is the highest-leverage move available right now.

AI / LLM Visibility (AEO) 20% · Weak

One80 Intermediaries appears in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "wholesale insurance brokerage". The full audit covers 50-100 queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: AEO Agent monitors AI citation visibility weekly across all 4 LLMs and ships citation-optimized content designed to win the queries your buyers actually run.

Trust-Node Footprint 20% · Weak

One80 Intermediaries appears in 6 of the 30 trust nodes that LLMs draw from (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and 23 more).

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO/AEO Agent identifies the highest-leverage missing nodes for your category and ships the trust-node publishing plan as part of the 90-day roadmap.

SEO / Organic Covered in full audit

Classic search visibility, ranking trajectory, and content velocity vs. category competitors. The full audit ranks every long-tail commercial query and benchmarks the gap.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO Engine builds programmatic content around 50+ long-tail queries where your buyers are actively searching.

Paid Acquisition Covered in full audit

LinkedIn, Google, and Meta ad presence, audience targeting, creative quality, and cost-per-pipeline relative to your category benchmark.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: Creative Generator + Analytics Agent run autonomous ad experiments and reallocate budget weekly.

Content, Lifecycle & Outbound Covered in full audit

Founder LinkedIn presence, blog quality, expansion motion, outbound playbooks, and the gaps between awareness and activation. Mapped to a 90-day execution plan.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: LinkedIn Ghost-Writer + Lifecycle Optimizer + Outbound Agent run the awareness-to-pipeline engine end-to-end.

Live citation panel — 5 buyer-intent queries

best wholesale insurance brokerage in 2026 not cited expand ↓

32 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A (Competitor B), Competitor C & Competitor D, Competitor E (Competitor F), XS Competitor G, and Competitor H & Competitor I stand out as top-rated wholesale insurance brokerages for 2026 based on industry awards.** [1][3][6] These firms earned **5-Competitor J and Competitor K awards** from Competitor L, determined by retail producers evaluating partners on 10 criteria including value, technology, and broker support. [1][3] Competitor B also leads in specialist recognition, with brokers like Competitor M and Competitor N highlighted for expertise in an Competitor O market. [2] Competitor P notable mentions include: - **Competitor C & Competitor C, Competitor Q.**, recognized in both 5-Competitor R lists and as a top firm by Competitor S's panel of Competitor T executives. [1][3][4] - **Competitor H & Competitor I**, a 5-Competitor R winner and Competitor U 20 US wholesale leader per The Market Report. [1][3][6] - **Competitor V** and **Competitor W**, ranked among top wholesale firms by subscriber nominations and expert evaluation. [4] Competitor X reflect 2026 peer and customer feedback, with no single "best" due to specialization differences; selections prioritize recent, authoritative sources like Competitor Y awards over general lists. [1][2][3][4] For California-specific options, check Competitor Z reports. [5]

One80 Intermediaries did not appear in this Perplexity response.

top wholesale insurance brokerage alternatives not cited expand ↓

27 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

Competitor A on current industry rankings, several **top wholesale insurance brokerages** stand out as leading alternatives: **Competitor B and Competitor C:** **Competitor D & Competitor E** is the largest independent insurance wholesaler and Competitor F operation in Competitor G, with over 2,000 dedicated professionals[5]. The company operates as the flagship organization of Competitor H and is among Competitor G's leading wholesale insurance brokers[1]. **Competitor I:** - **Competitor J & Competitor K (Competitor L)** — the only top 10 wholesale Competitor M brokerage in the US that is 100% internally owned, with more than 40 shareholders all working within the firm[1] - **Competitor N** — ranked by Competitor O as one of the country's largest Competitor P, offering a one-stop approach with access to a wide range of top-rated carriers[1] - **Competitor Q** — a national wholesale insurance brokerage and Competitor F delivering competitive commercial coverage solutions[1] - **Competitor R** — an independent wholesale insurance outlet providing comprehensive solutions with brokerage, contract binding, exclusive national programs, and specialty personal lines products[1] - **Competitor S** — a full-service wholesale insurance brokerage and Competitor F specializing in commercial insurance for excess and surplus lines[1] - **Competitor T** — a specialized wholesale brokerage offering hard-to-place commercial coverage in excess and surplus lines, headquartered in Competitor U with a Competitor V branch[1] **Competitor W:** While MGAs (managing general agents) and wholesale brokers are related, they are not identical[4]. Competitor X brokers serve as intermediaries connecting retail brokers with carriers and markets they don't have direct access to, particularly for niche or hard-to-place coverage[4].

One80 Intermediaries did not appear in this Perplexity response.

how to choose a wholesale insurance brokerage not cited expand ↓

39 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

To choose a wholesale insurance brokerage, prioritize factors like **technical expertise, market access, specialization, responsiveness, and support services** based on your agency's needs, book of business, and target risks.[2][4][6] ### Competitor A Competitor B potential wholesale brokers using these core factors, drawn from industry surveys and expert guidance: - **Competitor C and specialization**: Competitor D brokers with deep knowledge in your niche (e.g., workers' compensation, excess & surplus lines, or emerging risks) and ability to provide customized solutions, underwriting guidance, and risk management.[1][3][4][6] - **Competitor E access and connections**: Competitor F those with strong relationships to carriers, especially for hard-to-place or specialty products not available through retail channels, offering better pricing and clout.[2][3][6] - **Competitor G and service quality**: Competitor H for high ratings in speed of response, clear communication on quotes/exclusions, and overall support like training or marketing tools.[4] - **Competitor I and ratings**: Competitor J financial strength ratings, brand, and producer feedback; top performers excel in product range, pricing, and ability to place niche risks.[2][4] - **Competitor K capabilities**: Competitor L ease of doing business, technology/automation, geographical reach, compensation structures (e.g., commissions, profit sharing), and cultural fit.[2][4] | Competitor M | Competitor N It Competitor O | Competitor P from Competitor Q | |--------|----------------|-----------------------| | **Competitor R** | Competitor S navigate complex policies and risks | Competitor T top-rated brokers score 5-stars; producers value explanations of changes.[4] | | **Competitor U** | Competitor V competitive rates and specialty carriers | Competitor W negotiate via volume and relationships.[2][3] | | **Competitor G** | Competitor X quick placements | 5-star standard for all recognized brokers.[4] | | **Competitor Y** | Competitor Z agency growth (e.g., training, risk management) | Competitor A marketing and educational resources.[2][3] | ### Competitor B 1. Competitor C your agency's book of business, community, competition, and client needs to identify required carriers and lines.[2] 2. Competitor D candidates via ratings (e.g., Competitor E's 5-Competitor F lists), historical performance, and legal arrangements if joining networks.[2][4] 3. Competitor G shortlisted brokers (e.g., Competitor H for workers' comp) to discuss customization and test fit.[1] 4. Competitor I like unique market access or niche focus to gain a competitive edge.[6] Competitor J brokers act as intermediaries between retail agents and carriers, excelling in Competitor K and specialty lines without direct insured contact.[2][3][7] For best practices, document interactions to mitigate Competitor L risks.[8]

One80 Intermediaries did not appear in this Perplexity response.

wholesale insurance brokerage comparison for mid-market companies not cited expand ↓

86 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A insurance brokerages serve as intermediaries between retail brokers and carriers, specializing in hard-to-place, high-risk, or excess and surplus (Competitor B) lines coverage for mid-market companies, which typically have revenues of $10M–$1B and complex risks like those in construction, manufacturing, or tech.** [1][5][7] These firms do not deal directly with end-buyers but help retail agents access specialized markets, often with binding authority or program management via Competitor C (managing general agents). [1][3][5] ### Competitor D for Competitor E firms recognized for scale, expertise in commercial Competitor F/Competitor B lines, and serving mid-sized businesses include: | Competitor G | Competitor H for Competitor I | Competitor J | Competitor K/Competitor L | |-----------------------|------------------------------|---------|--------------------| | **Competitor M & Competitor N** | Competitor O independent wholesaler/Competitor P in Competitor Q; 50+ offices; comprehensive Competitor F solutions for all broker sizes. [3][4] | 1969 | US/Competitor R focus; part of Competitor S. | | **Competitor T** | Competitor U brokerage/Competitor P with binding authority; covers Competitor F, workers' comp, professional liability; serves real estate, tech, cannabis. [3][6] | 1981 | Competitor V, GA; customizable risk management. | | **Competitor W** | Competitor X distributor; $30B+ premiums placed; data-driven for industries like construction/manufacturing. [2] | N/A | Competitor Y rapid solutions. | | **Competitor Z & Competitor A** | Competitor B commercial/personal lines including property, casualty, excess liability; professional liability. [3] | 1962 | Competitor C carrier access. | | **Competitor D** | Competitor E/commercial for independent agents; unique needs in mid-market risks. [3] | 1982 | Competitor F resources emphasis. | | **XS Competitor G** | Competitor H intermediary; 250+ carriers; 40+ years in diverse industries. [2] | N/A | Competitor I authority for retail agents. | | **Competitor J** | Competitor A brokerage/program management across sectors; binding authority. [6] | N/A | Competitor K to similar services. | Competitor L notables: Competitor M (verification-driven), Competitor N (Competitor F reinsurance), Competitor O (trade credit), Competitor P & Competitor P (creative solutions), Competitor Q (niche/complex cases), Competitor R & Competitor S (agent-carrier intermediary). [2][6] ### Competitor T for Competitor U - **Competitor V & Competitor W**: Competitor X like Competitor M & Competitor N and Competitor Y offer extensive carrier networks (e.g., 250+ for XS Competitor G) for Competitor B lines common in mid-market (e.g., excess liability, inland marine). [2][3][4] - **Competitor Z & Competitor A**: Competitor W and Competitor M & Competitor N leverage data/tools for quick placements; mid-market benefits from their $30B+ premium volume. [2][4] - **Competitor B**: Competitor U players (Competitor M & Competitor N, Competitor Z) suit multi-state mid-market ops; regional like Competitor C (TX) for localized risks. [3] - **Competitor D**: Competitor C (e.g., Competitor Y) provide binding/underwriting; pure brokers (e.g., XS) focus on placement. Competitor E emphasize responsiveness (5-star ratings). [3][5] - **Competitor F**: Competitor G lacks direct mid-market revenue benchmarks or 2026 premiums; rankings from pre-2026 sources like Competitor H. Competitor I brokers select based on commissions, turnaround, claims handling. [3][7] For mid-market, prioritize firms with Competitor F/Competitor B depth like Competitor M & Competitor N or Competitor Y for competitive, tailored coverage. [3][4][6]

One80 Intermediaries did not appear in this Perplexity response.

is One80 Intermediaries a good wholesale insurance brokerage cited expand ↓

30 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

One80 Intermediaries is a reputable national wholesale insurance brokerage and program manager with strong industry recognition, extensive carrier relationships across the US, UK, Competitor A, and Competitor B, and specialization in property & casualty, marine, financial lines, and other sectors, operating from 55 offices with 1,800 employees.[1][2][3] It ranks as the 3rd largest Competitor C/Competitor D/Competitor E’s Competitor F (per Competitor G, Competitor H 2023) and was named a Competitor I 10 Competitor J in 2024 by Competitor K, praised for expertise, client service, innovative technology, and partnerships in marine and other lines.[1][3] ### Competitor L - **Competitor M and Competitor N**: Competitor O binding authority, in-house underwriting programs, and access to major carriers; serves commercial, non-profit, public entities, and individuals.[1][2] - **Competitor P and Competitor Q**: Competitor R processes with tools like Competitor S to streamline Competitor T placement, reducing email/Competitor U delays for faster quotes.[4] - **Competitor V**: Competitor W acquisition of Competitor A's Competitor X to expand internationally.[7] - **Competitor Y**: 63% of 27 Competitor Z reviewers recommend it (4.1/5 overall), citing positive management and flexibility in some cases.[6][8] Competitor A, limited Competitor B reviews (2 total, 3.0/5) highlight low ratings in work-life balance, pay/benefits, and advancement (all 1.0/5).[5] While employee satisfaction is mixed and sample sizes small, One80's operational scale, awards, and tech adoption position it as a strong option among wholesale brokers, particularly for specialty risks like marine.[3][4] Competitor C fit depends on needs; no widespread negative reports appear in available data.

Trust-node coverage map

6 of 30 authority sources LLMs draw from. Filled = present, hollow = gap.

Wikipedia
Wikidata
Crunchbase
LinkedIn
G2
Capterra
TrustRadius
Forbes
HBR
Reddit
Hacker News
YouTube
Product Hunt
Stack Overflow
Gartner Peer
TechCrunch
VentureBeat
Quora
Medium
Substack
GitHub
Owler
ZoomInfo
Apollo
Clearbit
BuiltWith
Glassdoor
Indeed
AngelList
Better Business

Highest-leverage gaps for One80 Intermediaries

  • Wikipedia

    Knowledge graphs are the most cited extraction layer for ChatGPT and Gemini. Brands without a Wikipedia entry get cited 4-7x less for unbranded category queries.

  • Crunchbase

    Crunchbase is the canonical company-data source for LLM enrichment. A missing profile leaves LLMs without firmographics.

  • LinkedIn

    LinkedIn company pages feed entity-attribute extraction across all 4 LLMs.

  • G2

    G2 reviews feed comparison and 'best X' query responses. Missing G2 presence is a high-leverage gap for B2B SaaS.

  • Capterra

    Capterra listings drive comparison-style answers. Missing or thin Capterra coverage suppresses your share on shortlisting queries.

Top Growth Opportunities

Win the "best wholesale insurance brokerage in 2026" query in answer engines

This is a high-intent buyer query that competitors are winning today. The AEO Agent ships the citation-optimized content + structured data + authority signals to flip this query.

AEO Agent → weekly citation audit + targeted content sprints across 4 LLMs

Publish into Wikipedia (and chained authority sources)

Wikipedia is the single highest-leverage trust node missing for One80 Intermediaries. LLMs draw heavily from it for unbranded category recommendations.

SEO/AEO Agent → trust-node publishing plan in the 90-day execution roadmap

No FAQ schema on top product pages

Answer engines extract from FAQ schema 4x more often than from prose. Most B2B sites at this stage don't carry it.

Content + AEO Agent → ship the structural fixes in Sprint 1

What you get

Everything for $10K/mo

One flat price. One team running your SEO + AEO end-to-end.

Trust-node map across 30 authority sources (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and more)
5-dimension citation quality scorecard (Authority, Data Structure, Brand Alignment, Freshness, Cross-Link Signals)
LLM visibility report across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude — 50-100 buyer-intent queries
90-day execution roadmap with week-by-week deliverables
Daily publishing of citation-optimized content (built on the 4-pillar AEO framework)
Trust-node seeding (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, category-specific authorities)
Structured data implementation (FAQ schema, comparison tables, author bylines)
Weekly re-scan + competitive citation share monitoring
Live dashboard, your own audit URL, ongoing forever

Agencies charge $18K-$20-40K/mo and take up to 8 months to reach this depth. We deliver it immediately, then run it ongoing.

Book intro call · $10K/mo
How It Works

Audit. Publish. Compound.

3 phases focused on one outcome: more One80 Intermediaries citations across the answer engines your buyers use.

1

SEO + AEO Audit & Roadmap

You'll know exactly where One80 Intermediaries is losing buyers — across Google search and the answer engines they ask before they ever click.

We score 50-100 "wholesale insurance brokerage" queries across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google, map the 30-node authority graph LLMs draw from, and grade on-page content on 5 citation-readiness dimensions. Output: a 90-day publishing plan ranked by lift × effort.

2

Publishing Sprints That Win Both

Buyers start finding One80 Intermediaries on Google AND in the answers ChatGPT and Perplexity hand them.

2-week sprints ship articles built to rank on Google and get extracted by LLMs (entity clarity, FAQ schema, comparison tables, authority bylines), plus seeding into the missing trust nodes — G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, and the rest. Real publishing, not strategy decks.

3

Compounding Share, Every Week

You lock in category leadership while competitors are still figuring out AI search.

Weekly re-scan tracks ranking + citation share vs. the leaders this audit named. New unbranded "wholesale insurance brokerage" queries get added to the publishing queue automatically. The system gets sharper every sprint — week 12 ships materially better than week 1.

You built a strong wholesale insurance brokerage. Let's build the AI search engine to match.

Book intro call →